|
[Sponsors] |
[solidMechanics] Support thread for "Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend" |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 18, 2012, 07:47 |
|
#41 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
Hopefully the solvers will do what you want! Last edited by bigphil; December 18, 2012 at 07:47. Reason: typo |
||
January 14, 2013, 08:56 |
empty page in source-forge for the new solidMechanics solver
|
#42 | |
New Member
Tian Tang
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
hi, dear Philip,
thanks a lot for sharing these new solvers. Since i found your old post saying that the codes can be manually download from the link, however when i click into it, an error shows: "no such project". I was wondering is this because the solvers have neem moved? may I ask you about where i can found and look at the codes now? Your kind response would greatly appreciated! Tian Quote:
|
||
January 14, 2013, 10:06 |
|
#43 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
I think something might be wrong with the git on sourceforge. The OpenFOAm-Extend project is found here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openfoam-extend/develop And normally it is possible to browse the git code by clicking on the git browse code but it does not seem to be working at the moment. Hmmn... Philip |
||
January 14, 2013, 10:36 |
|
#44 | |
New Member
Tian Tang
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi, dear Philip
thanks for the quick response. yes, you are right, there seems a problem with the git repository of openfoam-extend. I just saw the news from OpenFOAM wiki that: Currently links to the SVN and GIT repositories of openfoam-extend on Sourceforge are not working because these were taken offline. The reason for that is that ANSYS claims three classes (none of them really essential) of the 1.6-ext are under their copyright. The matter is being worked on. All other services at openfoam-extend are still functional. hopefully, the problem will be fixed soon so I can look at your solidMechanics solver regards, Tian Quote:
|
||
January 16, 2013, 12:20 |
|
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I was wondering (and found no answer to this yet) if one could use these solid solvers on an anisotropic materials like composites. I guess the tricky part is importing the materials properties in the good reference frame but I'm not sure of this. The goal is the simulation of the aging (thermal / time equivalent) of a composite like bended pipe. Any help would be greatly appreciated ! Regards, Florian |
|
January 16, 2013, 12:39 |
|
#46 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
Actually, I started working on simulation of orthotropic composite materials last year and I have developed a large strain orthotropic finite volume solver (elasticOrthoNonLinULSolidFoam) where the principal fibre directions are general. It requires 9 material properties (3 Young's moduli, 3 Poisson's ratio and 3 shear moduli) and the fibre direction field must be defined. I have a written a paper on the development of the solver and it is currently under-review. Once the paper is (hopefully) accepted, then I will add it to the solidMechanics branch. If you are in a rush for the solver, then you can pm me and maybe we could collaborate. Best regards, Philip |
||
January 16, 2013, 14:08 |
|
#47 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
Also, I was wondering, is it complex to modify the elasticThermalSolidFoam into a large deformation solver with also a plastic behaviour ? This may sounds a bit messy but I'm trying to mimic the aging of human tissues (very simple at first) using thermics. The material proprieties would change with temperature in the same way the time does, on long term. Regards, Florian |
||
January 17, 2013, 12:54 |
|
#48 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
In principle, it should not be that difficult to develop a large strain thermal-elasto-plastic solver, essentially all the work is done, you just have to merge the solvers elasticThermalSolidFoam, elasticPlasticSolidFoam and elasticNonLinTLSolidFoam. The momentum equation will have small strain terms, large strain terms, a thermal stress term and a plastic stress term. Also make sure the traction boundary condition has all these terms. That's the idea, let me know if you have any specific questions about it. Best regards, Philip |
||
January 18, 2013, 16:58 |
|
#49 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you very much for your help ! I'll try to do that soon.
Best regards, Florian |
|
January 19, 2013, 11:32 |
|
#50 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Hi Philip,
I have a small question with respect to your contribution, now that the git is offline. I have found a formulation to a boundary condition, which requires a fixedCurvature type condition on the pressure, i.e. the second spatial derivative of the pressure normal to the boundary. Such a boundary condition is to my knowledge not available in OF, however, you will need that type of BC, when your are modelling solids, correct? My question is: Will I be able to find an implementation, which I can modify, in the Solid Mechanics toolbox? All the best Niels |
|
January 19, 2013, 12:11 |
|
#51 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
Hmmnn all the solidMechanics solvers are displacement based and therefore (hydrostatic) pressure is not needed - it can be calculated post processing if required. But mixed displacement-pressure solvers should not need the second spatial derivative of pressure, actually you don't even need the first derivative as gradU/pressure is uniform for a cell. Maybe I am not quite understanding the question, but all the solid BCs essentially just need gradU at the boundary and none use grad(gradU). Best regards, Philip |
||
January 19, 2013, 12:26 |
|
#52 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Hi Philip,
I probably was not that clear. The boundary condition in question is related to a flow solver and not related to solids. The reason, I ask this question to you, is that I remember from my classes in civil engineering many years ago that a zero moment at a boundary is related to the second derivative of the displacement. Therefore I thought you might have implemented an abstract base class for this type of boundary condition, which I could "steal" for my purpose. Nonetheless, I can understand that you do not need those in your formulation, thus I will try to see, if I can find the time to do the work myself. Thanks, Niels |
|
January 19, 2013, 13:02 |
|
#53 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Hi Niels,
OK I see, unfortunately I can't help. Good luck! Philip |
|
January 19, 2013, 13:03 |
|
#54 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Thanks anyway
|
|
February 13, 2013, 16:18 |
|
#55 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14 |
hey phil,
i am currently testing the icoFsiElasticNonLinULSolidFoam - looks amazing! just a minor suggestion: i think it's a bit misleading that the maximum number of Aitken iterations (nOuterCorr) is set in fvSolution under "PISO"... wouldn't it make more sense if that parameter was set in couplingProperties, just like outerCorrTolerance etc.? |
|
April 19, 2013, 02:49 |
|
#56 |
Member
Samer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Phil
i am using IcoFSINonLinUlSolidFoam for simulating fluid structure interaction and it's working very well for large deformations and the updated lagrangian used is perfect. However i have a question and i am new to OpenFoam, how can i add the temperature equation and the temperature coupling at the interface with this solver?? |
|
April 19, 2013, 06:05 |
|
#57 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
That's good the solver is working for you. To add temperature to icoFsiNonLinULSolidFoam, you need to add the energy equation for the solid and for the fluid. I think this stuff is already done for the conjugate heat transfer solvers (chtMultiRegionFoam, chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam). So essentially you have to merge icoFsiNonLinULSolidFoam and chtMultiRegionFoam/chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam. You can see how the interface temperature coupling is taken care of in the CHT solvers using a derived wall flux boundary condition. Best regards, Philip EDIT: The wiki has a nice account of how to add temperature to the fluid here. And you can see how temperature is added to the solid by comparing elasticSolidFoam and elasticThermalSolidFoam. Then the last thing you need is the temperature coupling. Last edited by bigphil; April 19, 2013 at 06:07. Reason: more info |
||
April 19, 2013, 06:43 |
|
#58 |
Member
Samer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 13 |
One more question: if i added the temperature equation and the coupling, do i have to make changes concerning running the solver in parallel??
|
|
April 19, 2013, 06:51 |
|
#59 |
Senior Member
Matthias Voß
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 449
Rep Power: 20 |
1# maybe move to new thread
2# o.f. routines will handle the parallelization 3# http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Ho...ure_to_icoFoam |
|
April 20, 2013, 15:17 |
|
#60 |
New Member
brant
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi Bigphil,
I am experienced at 3D modeling and have limited math skills.. I would like to model a hollow sphere or shell with interior resonant modes as well as shell modes, driven either from the interior or exterior... For extra credit I would like to model electric currents in the shell and use a material like iron to show magnetostrictive motions... Is this at all possible in openFOAM? I would like to know if at least the shell with modes could be modeled before I invest a lot of time into FOAM... What about plasma/solid interactions? Thanks for your time, Brant |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPU Linear Solvers for OpenFOAM | gocarts | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 37 | August 17, 2022 15:22 |
[Virtualization] OpenFOAM oriented tutorial on using VMware Player - support thread | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | July 11, 2012 17:01 |
New OpenFOAM Forum Structure | jola | OpenFOAM | 2 | October 19, 2011 07:55 |
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 3 | September 8, 2010 07:25 |
OpenFOAM Debian packaging current status problems and TODOs | oseen | OpenFOAM Installation | 9 | August 26, 2007 14:50 |