|
[Sponsors] |
1.5-dev: decomposePar pointDisplacement fails when a globalFaceZone is present |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 15, 2010, 06:56 |
1.5-dev: decomposePar pointDisplacement fails when a globalFaceZone is present
|
#1 |
Member
matteo lombardi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I have found out that when I try to decompose a run and there is a pointField (in my case pointDisplacement, I need it for mesh motion) and I also have a globalFaceZone, then the decomposePar application fails. The error it gives is: Processor 0: Field transfer size of field 16952 is not the same as the size of the mesh = 14438 ... Digging into the code I have found out that on processor 0: mesh.points()=14438 mesh.allPoints()=16952 It seems that "somewhere" one should substitute points with allPoints, but I cannot find where.. Probably when the the globalFaceZone feature has been added, all other field have been corrected accordingly but the pointFields.. or maybe only pointField are affected by the issue since are the only one that depends directly on the points.. Any one can help? Thanks, Matteo |
|
April 18, 2011, 13:24 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Hi Matteo,
I have the same problem, did you ever find a solution? Regards, Philip |
|
April 18, 2011, 13:27 |
|
#3 |
Member
matteo lombardi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
Unfortunately not... OF 1.6-ext has the same issue as well..
|
|
April 18, 2011, 13:36 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
OK thanks anyway,
hmmnn hopefully there's some way around the problem... I will keep trying. |
|
April 29, 2013, 04:58 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
xinguang cui
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
||
April 29, 2013, 11:18 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
||
April 29, 2013, 11:23 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
xinguang cui
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
||
May 5, 2013, 01:14 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
xinguang cui
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
Hey matteol:
Have ever solved the problem? If it is, would you please give me some hints. Quote:
|
||
May 5, 2013, 05:51 |
|
#9 |
Member
matteo lombardi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
Hey,
unfortunately I never managed to fix the problem and ten ended up using a different approach for my problem.. But I thought the problem had been fixed at some point.. Good luck, Ciao, Matteo |
|
May 5, 2013, 06:09 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
xinguang cui
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
hey, thanks for your reply, would you please introduce me a little the appoach that you used?
Thanks and best regards. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] ParaFoam instalation in OpenFoam 1.5 dev | titio | ParaView | 2 | July 25, 2010 00:24 |
OpenFOAM 1.5 dev | LVDH | OpenFOAM | 98 | May 5, 2010 18:01 |
[OpenFOAM] ParaView/ParaFoam in OpenFoam 1.5 dev | titio | ParaView | 2 | February 27, 2010 15:02 |
[OpenFOAM] Paraview/Parafoam in OpenFoam 1.5 dev | titio | ParaView | 0 | December 9, 2009 13:13 |
[OpenFOAM] Paraview/Parafoam in OpenFoam 1.5 dev | titio | ParaView | 0 | December 9, 2009 13:12 |