|
[Sponsors] |
channelFoam streamwise cyclic/processor boundary |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 15, 2010, 04:24 |
channelFoam streamwise cyclic/processor boundary
|
#1 |
New Member
Per Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi!
Some boundaries sometimes do more than transfer data, see attached figure of Q=10. (Q is computed only from the reconstructed U at this instant. White lines show processor boundaries.) Both cyclic and processor boundaries are visible, but only in the streamwise direction. (I see the same thing at the in/out boundaries also without lengthwise decomposition.) Therefore I suspect the problem to be related to the implementation of the driving pressure gradient in channelFoam. OpenFOAM-1.6.x, Ubar~20m/s, nu~1e-5, H=0.02m, ~3.5M vols on 8 cores. Regards, Per |
|
June 17, 2010, 07:15 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
I did a quick test but cannot repeat it.
- this is not the 0 startup solution? - what exactly are your steps? (run Q in parallel then reconstruct or reconstruct then run Q?, paraview to do isosurfaces?) Regards, Mattijs |
|
June 17, 2010, 07:43 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Per Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17 |
To start new-case:
1. blockMesh channel395-copy with the same number of nodes as new-case. 2. mapFields from channel395/0 to channel395-copy/0 3. copy channel395-copy/0 to new-case I would have guessed that much of the initial solution should be blown away by the high Ubar I set compared to channel395, but it appears much better than 0 initial. The case has run with dt=1e-5s to about 0.1s. pMean has almost converged. To generate the plot: 1. reconstruct last time 2. compute Q for reconstructed time (using util I got from Lillberg/Wikström) 3. foamToVTK for reconstructed time 4. create iso-surfaces with paraview I can compress the new case and upload to e.g. your ftp if you like. Regards, Per |
|
June 18, 2010, 01:39 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
Hi Per,
Does the same happen with the 16x Q utility? |
|
June 18, 2010, 03:01 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Per Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17 |
I will try on Tuesday (out of office now), but I doubt that it will make a difference for this. I think there is some distortion in the U field.
Regards, Per |
|
June 18, 2010, 04:20 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
If not, do you have a cut-down version of your case that you can send me or I can download from you?
|
|
June 18, 2010, 09:12 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Per Nilsson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17 |
Here is a package without the heavy timestep.
A timestep with p, nuSgs, k and especially U is 47MB compressed. Where can I put it? Regards, Per |
|
June 18, 2010, 12:13 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
No ftp site. Do you have a somewhere I can download it from. Alternatively can you use e.g. transferbigfiles?
|
|
Tags |
channelfoam, cyclic, processor boundary |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd Order Discretization and Streamwise Periodic | Will | FLUENT | 0 | August 29, 2008 13:01 |
Report Streamwise Pressure Gradient? | Will | FLUENT | 0 | July 12, 2008 23:01 |
Streamwise Second Derivatives | S. | CFX | 3 | October 4, 2007 03:16 |
streamwise coefficient multiplier | Rosalba Cobos De los Santos | CFX | 3 | July 13, 2006 11:08 |
Streamwise periodic heat transfer | Novice | CFX | 0 | March 4, 2006 09:14 |