|
[Sponsors] |
April 28, 2010, 05:08 |
GGI + postCalc
|
#1 |
Member
Antoine Devesa
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear Foam users and developers,
i just wanted to have your opinion on what i consider as a possible bug concerning postprocessing for a GGI simulation: if i compute any quantity using postcalc (like Lambda2 or Q) for more than one time step, then i get unphysical values at the GGI frontiers in the visualization of those quantities. I'm trying now with an #include "createMesh.H" before each call of the calc function in postCalc.H, and it seems to solve the problem. Is this the correct way to do that? |
|
July 13, 2010, 12:40 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Pavan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 17 |
I get large discontinuities but not non-physical values...I only ever calculated vorticity though...
|
|
July 13, 2010, 13:26 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Martin Beaudoin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 332
Rep Power: 22 |
Hello,
Can you reproduce the problem with either one of the actual OpenFOAM 1.5-dev tutorials, or using one of the Turbomachinery test cases suite? Contributing a new test case is ok too. See here: http://www.extend-project.de/project...m-test-harness That way, we could add a new GGI specific test to the test harness. http://openfoam-extend.sourceforge.net/CDash/index.php Martin |
|
July 13, 2010, 15:36 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Hi Antoine and Pavan,
to avoid confusion for all OpenFOAMŽers allow me a bit housekeeping... AFAIK, GGI has been developed within the OpenFOAM-Extend Project for OpenFOAMŽ-dev. Details can be found in the Presentation at the Workshop in Montreal or the Presentation at the OSCIC - both given by Martin and Hrvoje in 2008. As this forum section concerns the core of OpenFOAMŽ as it is released by OpenCFDŽ Limited and as OpenFOAMŽ-Extend (among other features and functionalities) provides a own bug tracker MantisBT, all bug reports concerning OpenFOAMŽ-dev (soon OpenFOAMŽ-ext) specific features might be better placed here: http://www.extend-project.de/project...nd-bug-tracker best,
__________________
Holger Marschall web: http://www.holger-marschall.info mail: holgermarschall@yahoo.de |
|
July 14, 2010, 06:01 |
|
#5 |
Member
Antoine Devesa
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello all,
@Holger: since there is no specific forum until now for openfoam-extend (the forum on the openfoam-extend website points to this cfd-online forum), where can we then discuss about things, before being sure we're dealing with bugs? Additionally, at the time i started this thread, there was neither the brandnew openfoam-extend website, nor the Mantis bug tracking... Shall i now report that problem there? |
|
July 14, 2010, 07:39 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
thanks for the feedback. @ discussions of OF-Extend features (or problems related to them): Basically there are two possibilities IMO (and it was just meant to keep things sorted). You could either start a discussion with the special interest group closest to your problem (http://www.extend-project.de/user-gr...turbomachinery) or start a new thread within this forum. @ time of thread start: Sorry, didn't see that. P.S.: Please write me a mail / message or start a discussion in a more common forum part to talk further... I really think, this is the wrong place. best,
__________________
Holger Marschall web: http://www.holger-marschall.info mail: holgermarschall@yahoo.de |
|
Tags |
ggi, lambda2, postcalc |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Floating point exception error | Alan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | July 1, 2021 22:51 |
Difference between ggi and overlapGgi? GGI Tips and Tricks? | philippose | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | January 16, 2013 10:40 |
Performance of GGI case in parallel | hannes | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | August 3, 2011 04:07 |
GGI bug?? | rieuk | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | April 25, 2010 11:47 |
BCs for parallel ggi | NickG | OpenFOAM | 1 | March 15, 2010 12:12 |