|
[Sponsors] |
January 24, 2008, 07:29 |
Hi,
I am trying to run Open
|
#1 |
Senior Member
John Deas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I am trying to run OpenFOAM on a Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3, blockMesh and icoFoam run fine on the cavity case, but when I tried to run decomposePar to solve it across several nodes, I get : decomposePar: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found (required by /home/flurec/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.4.1/lib/linuxGccDPOpt/libGKlib.so) Has anyone get through this problem ? I haven't had it on Centos 5.1 or Ubuntu 7.10 ... I also tried to run wmake in the decomposePar directory, but I got errors while it compile /tmp/ccLhuesa.s |
|
January 24, 2008, 07:35 |
And, if I run decomposePar on
|
#2 |
Senior Member
John Deas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 17 |
And, if I run decomposePar on another machine, and then launch icoFoam in parallel on the RHEL 3 machine, I get this message :
mca: base: component_find: unable to open paffinity linux: file not found (ignored) ... but the computation runs anyway and output results. Is this a severe default ? |
|
January 24, 2008, 09:46 |
RHEL 3 uses glibc_2.3.2
Upg
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 21 |
RHEL 3 uses glibc_2.3.2
Upgrade your OS it is nearly 5 years old. The only other alternative is to recompile everything including 3rd party components like gcc from scratch. |
|
January 24, 2008, 10:03 |
Maybe relinking is sufficient.
|
#4 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Maybe relinking is sufficient. It's faster. But recompiling is safer.
(Problem is, that still RHEL3 seems to be quite popular with clusters) BTW: Relinking: just remove everything in $FOAM_LIBBIN and $FOAM_APPBIN and Allwmake.
__________________
Note: I don't use "Friend"-feature on this forum out of principle. Ah. And by the way: I'm not on Facebook either. So don't be offended if I don't accept your invitation/friend request |
|
January 24, 2008, 11:04 |
Er, even if you leave everythi
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 21 |
Er, even if you leave everything in $FOAM_LIBBIN and $FOAM_APPBIN, executing Allwmake on a clean distribution will still trigger a complete recompile since the intermediate .o files are stripped out before release.
I think you have recompiled your own distro once to often! |
|
January 24, 2008, 11:06 |
You can use ermine (http://mag
|
#6 |
New Member
Valery Reznic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
You can use ermine (http://magicErmine.com) or statifier (http://statifier.sf.net) to pack program on system where it's work (Ubuntu) and them move packed executable to the "box in question"
Valery |
|
January 24, 2008, 12:02 |
The same thing happened for me
|
#7 |
New Member
N S Prasad
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
The same thing happened for me in RHEL 3. I haven't solved the problem yet....
|
|
January 24, 2008, 12:33 |
@Eugene: you're partly right:
|
#8 |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
@Eugene: you're partly right: I compiled it twice to often.
I pull back my post. Recompiling is ALWAYS the solution. And do it on the system with the lowest version number. Then the binaries should propably be compatible to all the others. (Assuming you only have distros from the same "family". If for instance you have a zoo of RedHat and Ubuntu boxes: Use the one with the lowest glibc)
__________________
Note: I don't use "Friend"-feature on this forum out of principle. Ah. And by the way: I'm not on Facebook either. So don't be offended if I don't accept your invitation/friend request |
|
January 24, 2008, 13:01 |
I really dislike glibc - nothi
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Eugene de Villiers
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 21 |
I really dislike glibc - nothing technical, just on a personal level.
Re static linking: Since OpenFOAM has more than a hundred executables, linking them all statically would use quite a lot of disk space. |
|
January 24, 2008, 15:13 |
Thank all for your advices.
|
#10 |
Senior Member
John Deas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank all for your advices.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New version fluent file open in Old version ? | MANOJKUMAR | FLUENT | 2 | July 10, 2013 05:43 |
which version | star | Siemens | 3 | January 14, 2009 05:19 |
Difference between Version 6.3 and Version 6.2 | erikaj | FLUENT | 0 | October 11, 2007 13:36 |
GLIBC libcso6 | fred | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | April 12, 2006 12:11 |
Version 3.5 | David Lloyd | Phoenics | 1 | August 7, 2002 10:22 |