|
[Sponsors] |
gmsh 4.11 suitability for boundary layer meshes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 13, 2022, 16:49 |
gmsh 4.11 suitability for boundary layer meshes
|
#1 |
Member
Giovanni Medici
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear all,
I've always been intrigued by gmsh, it really looks like a powerful tool, but never practiced it. Before considering it further, I'd like to ask any proficient gmsh user whether it is suitable for boundary layer inflation on 3D objects. I tried to dig a bit in the documentation where I found quite remarkable features (such as background meshes), but left my questions unanswered. Does it feature "collision avoidance" between nearby elements (e.g. layers squeezing, collapsing, or exclusion ?). Vector treatment (deflection of the layer's normals to allow inflating more)? Layers separation over an (angular) threshold? Thanks all ! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Layer coverage at 98% with collapses at corners | oryx | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | December 4, 2023 20:04 |
[Gmsh] Boundary Layer Excluded Face in Gmsh | cfdoruk | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | March 7, 2022 13:16 |
[snappyHexMesh] Prism layer collapsing in refinement transition | rubenparedes | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | May 13, 2021 11:55 |
[snappyHexMesh] Holes in internal mesh when adding boundary layer snappyHex | otaolafr | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | February 8, 2021 09:19 |
errors | Fahad | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 23, 2004 14:20 |