|
[Sponsors] |
What is a best practice to reduced number of iteration for steady simulation? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 19, 2021, 15:25 |
What is a best practice to reduced number of iteration for steady simulation?
|
#1 |
New Member
Abhishek
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Magdeburg, Germany
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6 |
I am performing steady flow simulation of a radial pump, which takes around 400,000 iterations to give satisfactory results (compared to experimental values). Now there is a need of testing many operating points and thus I need to run many simulations, which cost a lot of simulation time.
How can I achieve accurate results faster? -by refining mesh in particular zone, tweaking with initial values!!!! or!!! |
|
Tags |
accuracy, best practice, iterations increase, mesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foam::error::PrintStack | almir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 92 | May 21, 2024 08:56 |
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays | Jeffzda | ParaView | 30 | November 6, 2023 22:00 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh running killed! | Mark JIN | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | June 14, 2022 02:37 |
Inconsistencies in reading .dat file during run time in new injection model | Scram_1 | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 23, 2018 23:29 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |