|
[Sponsors] |
August 26, 2005, 15:31 |
FlowVision, a Russian CFD Programme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This is the first russian CFD programme I come across, you can download a 20000 node limited evaluation from their web portal www.flowvision.ru Enjoy, it has some interesting features and methods. I guess it is a serious competitor to the big guys.
|
|
August 27, 2005, 00:02 |
Re: FlowVision, a Russian CFD Programme
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Wau, at last my compatriots made something.
Although Russians are not so good in CFD but Russians fighters are the best |
|
August 27, 2005, 05:58 |
Re: FlowVision, a Russian CFD Programme
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's not the first one. FloWorks/EDF-Lab is based on the AeroShape-3D Program which was developed by Computational Aerodynamics Systems in Moscow. Later they started a cooperation with "Will and Partner GmbH" in Germany and formed "Nika". Developement is probably still in Russia.
|
|
September 10, 2005, 23:05 |
Re: FlowVision, a Russian CFD Programme
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The Floworks is now vigurously , silently is carving its way in the EFD field -making is available to the mass of designers- Fluent launched Flowizard after Floworks and I believe insopired by Floworks. Floworks is the T34 and others are Tiger,Panther etc. There was a competition between practical people like Cucherenco, Kalashnicov on one side and elaborated Dubbel,Hutte people like F.Porsche.
Look to the ease of meshing in Floworks how well is integrated in Solid Works and look to the complications and crashes of gambit Fluent meshing. |
|
June 29, 2011, 20:41 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Also compare the smooth performance of Floworks with CFDesign's when importing and running radiation problems in complex geometries. If CFDesign manages to mesh it after 10 attempts (forcing you to increase the mesh desnity to a couple of million cells) then it will take a day or so to calculate the view factors and reconcile the mesh. It will take another half day or so after that till the simulation converges (if you are lucky). The same model runs in Floworks for less than 4 hours. In addition look how easy and intuitive is to setup the model in Floworks compared with Fluent or CFX. |
||
June 29, 2011, 20:55 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Pauli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 17 |
Yep, those Russian fighters really do well at the Paris air show.
|
|
June 29, 2011, 22:04 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 16 |
||
June 30, 2011, 00:04 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
|
||
June 30, 2011, 02:43 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I also heard that CFDesign has bought (some time last year) the cfd code/algorithm from FlowVision and is ether working on, or has already implemented it in their prog. It is good news for cfdesign because their code was highly unstable (the same models with the same settings run with different versions or builds of CFdesign could profduce very different results). They have been recently bought by Autodesk which is also good. My company owns licenses of Floworks and I just love that program. My hope now is that the developers will implement some of the positive sides of Flotherm (like the calculation speed) and will make it perfect. Last edited by CFDfan; June 30, 2011 at 13:49. |
||
November 12, 2012, 05:46 |
|
#10 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 24 |
I'm happy that you like Floworks (now Flow Simulation)/FloEFD. Yes, the code has a very great history and is used in aerospace for some time now. Just recently it celebrated 21 years since the first license was sold to a russian aerospace company. At that time the code was known as Aero Shape 3D as someone mentioned already.
The technology of FloTHERM and the instantanious mesh is somewhat different to FloEFD and since FloEFD is a general purpose code with lots of physics that FloTHERM does not need (cavitation, non-newtonian flow, etc.) for its electronics cooling specialities, the speed of FloTHERM will not get into FloEFD from the FloTHERM technology side. But we will of course not stop to speed up the solver and mesher in future. Regards, Boris |
|
November 18, 2012, 09:42 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 18 |
Boris
How did you come to this seven years old post? I have retired! |
|
November 18, 2012, 10:18 |
|
#12 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 24 |
Hi Ahmed,
I was googleing Aero Shape 3D to see what is out there on it and found this thread and since the last post was just a year ago I thought I just comment on the last entry. Boris |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 0 | February 13, 2002 13:23 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 22:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 05:49 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 12:44 |