|
[Sponsors] |
February 2, 2012, 14:50 |
Pressure based solver question
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
Regarding the predictor-corrector family of methods (SIMPLE, SIMPLEC etc), can someone tell me the purpose of the velocity predictor step? Are there any methods which are based on only pressure correction, without velocity prediction? Any pointer to relevant literature will be much appreciated. Regards. |
|
February 2, 2012, 17:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 272
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Tobias,
Start to have a look to this here http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Veloc...ssure_coupling then read the book of patankar "numerical heat transfer and heat flow" and follow with "Computational fluid dynamics" from Ferziger-Peric You will find your answers. For incompressible flows velocity and pressure are deeply coupled. You can not correct one without correcting the other. |
|
February 3, 2012, 13:05 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73 |
As said, pressure in incompressible flows is not a thermodinamic variable and you have no equations governing it (it is a Lagrangian multiplier)... as well, scalar pressure is not a variable to be solved, you need to solve for a gradient of a suitable scalar function that ensures the divergence-free constraint. Solving for the "pressure" equation is therefore equivalent to solve the continuity equation. The relation between such a gradient and the real pressure gradient depends on the method.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Outlet Guage pressure | Mohsin | FLUENT | 36 | April 29, 2016 18:16 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
density based solver and energy | ashka | FLUENT | 0 | May 3, 2010 06:46 |
Question abt. the Riemann analytic solver | jinwon | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 16, 2007 15:11 |
Gas pressure question | Dan Moskal | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 24, 2002 23:02 |