|
[Sponsors] |
August 4, 2005, 15:16 |
LES flamelet models
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I want to know more about LES flamelet models.
In LES what value of the scalar dissipation rate should i use in the flamelet equations? I have seen that some authors presume a shape of the scalar dissipation rate based on the mixture fraction, whilst others choose to use a 'conditional averged' scalar dissiation rate often averaged on assumed homogenous planes!!! Also some authors use a sub-grid PDF for the sub-grid scalar dissipation rate (presumed lognormal) whilst others only use a PDF for the mixture fraction. Can anyone please explain this subject to me. I dont really understand which dissipation rate i should use in LES - should i assume a homogenous direction? ... do i need a PDF for the dissipation rate? ... do i need to presume a form for the dissipation rate? ... etc. Any comments would be welcome. |
|
August 5, 2005, 07:17 |
Re: LES flamelet models
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i have seen that Pitsch uses an unsteady flamelet model and a conditional average of the scalar dissipation rate (x). also cook uses a presumed form for x and a lognormal distibution. but i dont know which approach is more valid or which one is best to use.
anyone else any ideas? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LES and DES models for wind turbine | mohammad | Main CFD Forum | 6 | April 30, 2011 23:01 |
A bug in using dynamic LES models | arslantuf | OpenFOAM Bugs | 6 | December 8, 2009 17:34 |
LES models: | Jonathan Lemay | CFX | 6 | March 3, 2008 07:51 |
unsteady flamelet models | dean | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 5, 2005 20:22 |
Numerical Implementation of LES Wall models | dragon | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 14, 2005 01:53 |