|
[Sponsors] |
January 20, 2012, 05:28 |
2D Implicit HLLC scheme
|
#1 |
New Member
C.Harish
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello, I have developed implicit HLLC scheme for the euler equations and tried to test it on some 2-dimensional cases. But i found few problems with it and do not know the reasons for it.
1) my CFL number is not going beyond 5 for the implicit case 2) supersonic cases are totally diverging. can anyone tell me what is the problem, is it the nature of the HLLC implicit scheme or am i doing some mistake. the matrix solver i am using is GMRES |
|
January 21, 2012, 09:14 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 17 |
HLLC scheme is best suited for high mach cases. Something might be problem with you implementation. To check you implementation first try with 1D Shock tube cases given in Toro.
|
|
January 21, 2012, 14:22 |
|
#3 |
New Member
C.Harish
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 15 |
I have solved C_D nozzle problem which is a quasi 1d problem and it converged. Anyway i vl try the shocktube problem and check.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it feasible to apply implicit scheme in LES | EagleGao | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 24, 2011 15:04 |
implicit scheme for time step | vivian | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 23, 2006 04:47 |
time_step, implicit scheme, number of iterations | Isa | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 11, 2006 13:27 |
Komogrov time scale and implicit scheme for LES | Li Yang | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 17, 2004 02:13 |
How to choose the CFL number with implicit scheme? | D.T. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 23, 2002 14:56 |