|
[Sponsors] |
June 30, 2005, 15:24 |
Penalty method and triangular mesh
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am a chemical engineer and lately i have been reading about finite elements to compute stokes flow problems. As far as i understand, implementing reduced integration penalty (RIP) method approach using linear triangular mesh may lead to trivial solution. So is it true that one should never use linear triangular mesh?
Any leads on this will be highly appreciated. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamic mesh, hinged flap | Randre | FLUENT | 37 | August 9, 2014 11:40 |
DG on triangular mesh - numerical viscosity | maximsch2 | Main CFD Forum | 12 | October 11, 2011 19:04 |
Lumped mass on triangular unstructured mesh | Petrov | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 5, 2011 13:49 |
Literature about the VOF method for triangular meshes | Ricardo Bonon | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 7, 2000 08:55 |
unstructured vs. structured grids | Frank Muldoon | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 5, 1999 11:09 |