CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Modelling of infinite cylinder

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 6, 2011, 06:09
Default Modelling of infinite cylinder
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15
bibelka is on a distinguished road
Hello!

My question may sound stupid, however it is very important to me.
How to model boundaries in z-direction in infinite cylinder, assuming the flow is turbulent?

Sorry, if something is unclear from my description.
bibelka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2011, 18:07
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
there are no stupid questions

Just use periodic bcs in the z-direction, that should do the trick. what kind of turbulence modelling are you doing? LES?
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2011, 03:47
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15
bibelka is on a distinguished road
Thanks!
RANS, actually, however hope that periodic will still work =)
bibelka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2011, 16:20
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Yes, in a way, RANS is the only method in which periodic BCs work without any limitations!

Good luck!
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 8, 2011, 02:30
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15
bibelka is on a distinguished road
Thank you! =)) And what are the disadvanteges or limitations of using RANS? LES is a good alternative or not?
bibelka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2011, 12:32
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bibelka View Post
Thank you! =)) And what are the disadvanteges or limitations of using RANS? LES is a good alternative or not?

that's a very broad question. Just the basics: RANS assumes that your mean flow is steady, and models the lumped effect (dissipation) of turbulence. Also, RANS works not to well for separated flows and complex geometries.

LES resolves the larger vortices of the flow, and models only parts of it, so it is inherently unsteady, but many times more expensive than RANS....


that's just a quick answer, there are many more aspects to this. What in particular interests you?
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2011, 12:33
Default
  #7
Member
 
Zachariah Swetky
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 15
swetkyz is on a distinguished road
Meaningful usage of LES is very difficult. Meshes must be much finer, and care must be taken in setting up the simulation.

There is a great deal of good information in the following AIAA paper:
"Large-Eddy Simulation: Current Capabilities, Recommended Practices, and Future Research." Georgiadis, N. J. et. al.

You may want to do the RANS simulation, and if you find that you want to resolve the turbulent structures more explicitly, try LES as a deeper exploration into your problem.

Good luck!

-Zachariah
swetkyz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundaries, infinite cylinder


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modelling of fluid flowing from a cylinder Phil FLUENT 1 May 7, 2008 02:09
PLEASE HELP HELP modelling free vibration cylinder Ken FLUENT 0 June 23, 2007 12:35
2D cylinder modelling pieizquierdo (miguel) FLUENT 0 January 10, 2005 17:59
infinite cylinder Glenn FLUENT 1 September 19, 2002 09:58
infinite cylinder Glenn Main CFD Forum 0 September 16, 2002 10:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:45.