|
[Sponsors] |
September 29, 2011, 11:05 |
Cryogenic boiling: CFX or FLUENT
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 |
I am going to try to simulate boiling of a cryogenic liquid in an upflow through annulus tubes for my graduation prjocect. In this company we have both CFX and FLUENT available but the majority of my collegues have experience in CFX. Now is my question which software package handels boiling good. What are the positive and negative points of these programs?
|
|
September 29, 2011, 19:02 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I can't say much for FLUENT, but I can say that this is not a particularly easy problem to do in CFX. It can be done, and I have done many VOF/Multiphase simulations in CFX. I would say the most important aspect to performing this simulation is a good mesh, especially in the region where you expect the free surface interface to reside. If you are expecting a moving free surface boundary, you will need a giant, well refined mesh to accurately capture the interface movement. I would suggest using a two species single fluid model, instead of using two fluid models with mass transfer.
|
|
September 30, 2011, 03:30 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
In the meanwhile I found some information of a cavitation like model. Can this be the solution to my problem? |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 03:54 |
Fluent and CFX | Ale | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 30, 2008 22:14 |
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 16:02 |
CFX compared to FLUENT | newbie | CFX | 1 | August 1, 2005 19:29 |
CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent | William | CFX | 20 | October 29, 2001 14:55 |