|
[Sponsors] |
May 21, 2005, 06:15 |
2D incompressible turbulent flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear for all, I'm going to simulate the steady incompressible turbulent flow arrond an airfoil. There are many Formulations such as : Mac method, Simple, piso...etc. But wath is the best one for these kind of problemes? Thanks for your response in advance
|
|
May 21, 2005, 10:52 |
Re: 2D incompressible turbulent flow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If MAC, SIMPLE, PISO are equally unfamiliar to you, Choose SIMPLE for popularity. MAC requires Catesican grids.
|
|
May 22, 2005, 09:59 |
Re: 2D incompressible turbulent flow
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks versi for your response. It is not an equation, that is unfamiliar or no for me. I surch what is the suimple method regarding the other ones. For Mac method is then employed in generalised coordinates.
|
|
May 23, 2005, 05:41 |
Re: 2D incompressible turbulent flow
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
MAC - is the most simple, SIMPLE - most popular. I've worked on both and if you use a turbulence model (k-e or RSA), i'd suggest using SIMPLE. Have you tried LES or DNS? I've tried Piso, but not much luck, I'm afraid.
|
|
May 23, 2005, 11:28 |
Re: 2D incompressible turbulent flow
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
very thanks Nick, Yes, I surch the eseay method. For steady incompressible turbulent flow I'm going to start with k-epsilon model and finaly the LES method.
|
|
June 2, 2005, 12:02 |
Re: 2D incompressible turbulent flow
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the physics of 2D turbulence ( e.g. thin films ) is completely different to 3D turbulence. I'd read a little more before going down this investigation route. Your simulations will not capture the inverse cacade of 2D turbuelnce as K-E model assumed dissipation which does not occur in 2D turbulence!
Hope this helps! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Particle deposition on circular cylinder in turbulent flow | Julian K. | CFX | 1 | October 3, 2011 18:51 |
Difference between recirculation zone and turbulent flow region | ashtonJ | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 16, 2011 04:46 |
laminar and turbulent flow in one simulation | msna | FLUENT | 0 | January 27, 2007 18:35 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |