|
[Sponsors] |
May 7, 2005, 13:02 |
PISO - new questions
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This is already the third time that I am asking about PISO, but strange things are happening and perhaps anybody can help me: I implemented the PISO and it is running but it doesn't hold what for example Issa is promising: -In steady state cases I can realy calculate very fast, sometimes four times as fast as SIMPLE (then also iteratively in PISO), but in unsteady cases (for example Karman Vortex Street) I cannot see advantages. Some Information about my Program: -I used for the second Pressure Correction Equation the same coefficients as in the first one. They contain the Neumann-Boundary-Conditions for all Boundaries. Have I to change them in any way? -In the unsteady cases Issa shows, it is possible to run PISO without Iteration for small time steps. What is SMALL? How can I see, that the approximated solution is good, what can I use as Residuum (the normally used residuum is remaining high...) -I do not use underrelaxation for Momentum Equations and no underrelaxation Pressure Correction.
Thank you all for your help, I hope anybody understands my problems, it's difficult to formulate them, and I am a CFD beginner. Greatings, Benni! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PISO Questions | titio | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | July 23, 2024 06:32 |
PISO Details | Dr B.M. Smith (Smith) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | November 17, 2009 12:31 |
Development of a Low mach PISO solver | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | August 25, 2009 13:48 |
SIMPLE and PISO | Aditya | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 1, 2006 19:52 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 07:54 |