Steady state vs. mean transient analysis of flow behind a circular cylinder

Heini · June 8, 2011, 13:26

Hi

I'm looking at the current reduction behind a circular cylinder in a steady flow, at Re = 2100. I have solved it with a steady state solver and k-eps turbulence model, using Fluent. But is this a good enough approach, if one needs a detailed "image" of the flow reduction behind the cylinder? My guess is that a statistical mean velocity of a transient analysis, would show a broder flow reduction path close to the cylinder, than what would be predicted from the steady state solution, due to the detail of the vortex street. Any comments about this proposal, or does anby one know of articles regarding this subject?

Regards,
Heini

vkrastev · June 9, 2011, 07:47

Hi,
I have some experience at higher Reynolds numbers (form 1e05 to 3.6e06) in simulating the two-dimensional flow around circular cylinders. I can tell you that accounting for the vortex shedding makes a significant difference in terms, for instance, of the predicted pressure drag coefficient: applying the RNG k-epsilon turbulence model, my time-averaged URANS results were far more accurate than the steady-state RANS results.

Best Regards

V.

June 8, 2011, 13:26	Steady state vs. mean transient analysis of flow behind a circular cylinder	#1
Heini New Member Heini Rasmussen Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 16	Hi I'm looking at the current reduction behind a circular cylinder in a steady flow, at Re = 2100. I have solved it with a steady state solver and k-eps turbulence model, using Fluent. But is this a good enough approach, if one needs a detailed "image" of the flow reduction behind the cylinder? My guess is that a statistical mean velocity of a transient analysis, would show a broder flow reduction path close to the cylinder, than what would be predicted from the steady state solution, due to the detail of the vortex street. Any comments about this proposal, or does anby one know of articles regarding this subject? Regards, Heini

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder	Ardalan	Main CFD Forum	7	December 15, 2020 14:06
Steady state flow over cylinder	vmlxb6	CFX	4	February 16, 2011 16:04
Constant velocity of the material	Sas	CFX	15	July 13, 2010 09:56
Flow around a sphere and a circular cylinder	Francis	Main CFD Forum	0	September 29, 2008 06:16
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems	Lisa	Main CFD Forum	11	July 5, 2000 15:37

June 9, 2011, 07:47		#2
vkrastev Senior Member Vesselin Krastev Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: University of Tor Vergata, Rome Posts: 368 Rep Power: 20	Hi, I have some experience at higher Reynolds numbers (form 1e05 to 3.6e06) in simulating the two-dimensional flow around circular cylinders. I can tell you that accounting for the vortex shedding makes a significant difference in terms, for instance, of the predicted pressure drag coefficient: applying the RNG k-epsilon turbulence model, my time-averaged URANS results were far more accurate than the steady-state RANS results. Best Regards V.