|
[Sponsors] |
Problem on Objectivity of eduction techniques |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 28, 2005, 05:35 |
Problem on Objectivity of eduction techniques
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
" The quasi-coherent structures described above have been identified mainly through visualizations of low-Reynolds-number turbulent flows (either from experiments or from DNS). Such a subjective approach inevitably leads to controversy over the nature and significance of the structures. As a consequence, over the years, there have been many suggestions for objective eduction techniques, to identify structures and to quantify their importance." (quoted from Popes' Turbulent Flow, 2003)
I do not understand how objectivity can be achieved in eduction techniques. I supposed DNS is the most accurate solution to turbulent flow. If DNS is a subjective approach, how do eduction techniques achieve an objective solution? Does objective solution possible in science? |
|
April 1, 2005, 12:23 |
Re: Problem on Objectivity of eduction techniques
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You have missed the point of the paragraph. The phrase 'subjective approach' refers to the fact that the structures have been identified from visualization rather than from any rigorous mathematical or physical approach (which are objective).
-S |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with interFoam; Wave/wiggle alpha1 behavior | JonW | OpenFOAM | 10 | February 4, 2023 08:27 |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 05:43 |
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem | JFDC | FLUENT | 1 | July 11, 2011 06:59 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 07:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 20:13 |