|
[Sponsors] |
March 24, 2005, 21:57 |
fundamental questions
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear CFD users,
I have two questions about CFD. 1. In general, why is orthogonal mesh preferabble rather than triangular mesh? 2. Can FVM solver solve fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems? or can only FEM solver solve FSI problems? I'd appreciate a lot for you answers in advance. |
|
March 25, 2005, 10:30 |
Re: fundamental questions
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Jim
For orthogonal meshes: 1) Orthogonal mesh is preferabble in cases where you can align the mesh with the flow direction (face normal of a CV = flow direction through the CV). If the flow is not aligned with the face normals, then you can induce errors in the calculation. See Patankar's book on the error induced due to non-alignment of mesh. 2) In FV formulation for an unstructrued mesh, typically the defect correction approach is used for the diffusion terms. This requires an approximation for the gradient at the face of a CV. For highly non-orthogonal meshes, sometimes, this approximation becomes very bad and the solution convergence is significantly hampered. There are probably more reasons which other users can site. For FSI+FVM: 1) Yes FVM solvers can solve FSI+FVM |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two fundamental questions about icoFoam while updating the velocities and pressure | dbxmcf | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | April 12, 2016 16:05 |
possible interview questions | atturh | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 21, 2012 08:53 |
NACA0012 Validation Case Questions | ozzythewise | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 3, 2010 14:39 |
[Other] Some perhaps stupid questions about calculix | lynx | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | May 17, 2010 06:48 |
2 Fundamental CFD Questions regarding convergence | Jon | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 24, 2005 20:47 |