|
[Sponsors] |
May 30, 2011, 17:45 |
Gambit 2.4.6 - car meshing
|
#1 |
New Member
Tiago Portolon
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi everyone,
I'm using Gambit 2.4.6 to mesh a car geometry. Using the geometry commands, I divided the single volume into three volumes, to use different element sizes for each one. When I try to mesh the first volume, the program stops and shows the message "running out of memory". My machine has 4GB RAM, and use a core i5 processor. I think that hardware is not the main problem. Does anyone have suggestions? Thanks in advance |
|
June 1, 2011, 15:16 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Yuncheng Xu (Cloud)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
I am new in CFD, but I suggest you to mesh that whole single volume to make sure if your hardware is okay! If it is well to be meshed, you may provide specific images about your works.
|
|
June 1, 2011, 17:12 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Tiago Portolon
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Thanks |
||
June 5, 2011, 18:42 |
|
#4 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England (South West)
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17 |
how many cells have you got in each of the volumes?, I think Gamble has a limit , or certainly it starts moaning if it gets large, try further subdividing your domain to lower the cell count per volume.
Last edited by Nickul; June 5, 2011 at 18:57. Reason: (edit for spellin) |
|
Tags |
gambit 2.4.6, memory, volume meshing |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] 3D boundary layer and meshing problem in GAMBIT 2.4.6 | prashanthreddyh | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | December 20, 2011 01:35 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Migrating from GAMBIT to ANSYS Meshing | David-CFD | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | April 1, 2011 06:22 |
[GAMBIT] Desperate student needs help meshing 3D GAMBIT model - please help! | lau06165 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | March 22, 2010 02:09 |
Meshing Aircraft with Gambit | Ed | FLUENT | 5 | November 9, 2004 06:04 |