 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
March 8, 2005, 06:44
|
High Angle of Attack
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I want to ask which tubulence modle used to solve high angle of attack case is better?????
|
|
|
||
|
March 8, 2005, 09:26
|
Re: High Angle of Attack
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
higher order k-epsilon (quadratic and cubic) are better for seperated flows as per my experience.
|
|
|
|
||
|
March 8, 2005, 09:30
|
Re: High Angle of Attack
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Do the RNG k-epsilon and realizable k-epsilon fall into this catergory?
|
|
|
|
||
|
March 8, 2005, 12:05
|
Re: High Angle of Attack
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Never used them, I am not expert in turbulence. Just based on experience I have adviced.
A.S. |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Netgen] Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM | hsieh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 32 | September 13, 2011 06:50 |
| Fluent-wrong cl value at high angle of attack | Lucas | FLUENT | 8 | December 1, 2010 07:18 |
| convegence problem with high angle of attack | littlelz | CFX | 2 | October 28, 2009 07:07 |
| modelling inviscid 2D flow at high angle of attack | Ferdinando | FLUENT | 2 | October 30, 2007 18:26 |
| Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |
Linear Mode
