|
[Sponsors] |
February 28, 2005, 14:35 |
advection schemes HELP
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am doing a little bit of research on some basic advection schemes, and getting a bit confused - i need to know why an upwind scheme is more numerically stable than the Van Leer scheme. Is it because the Van Leer scheme requires iteration?
|
|
February 28, 2005, 16:12 |
Re: advection schemes HELP
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm not sure I understand your question. The most basic Van Leer scheme is a flux vector splitting scheme which is an upwind scheme. As I recall, flux-vector splitting schemes suffer from being only first-order accurate and requiring homogeneous flux vector functions. They are however fairly stable (with proper care taken at sonic points). What upwind scheme are you comparing to flux vector splitting?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
second order schemes | marine | OpenFOAM | 67 | April 11, 2022 19:19 |
time stepping schemes for compressible DNS/LES | shyamdsundar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 15, 2010 00:15 |
Energy Conservation Schemes! | Science Seeker | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 21, 2001 04:31 |
Advection schemes for LES | kalyan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 17, 2001 14:43 |
Higher-order bounded convection schemes for pure advection with discontinuity | Anthony | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 13, 1999 03:36 |