|
[Sponsors] |
April 24, 2011, 17:30 |
production term on staggered grid
|
#1 |
New Member
behzad
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi everybody,
I'm writing a code for simulation of a turbulent flow using finite volume, fully staggered grid and the standard k-epsilon equations. Staggered grids have the advantage of being conservative of kinetic energy , which becomes important for turbulent flows. But I have a problem in calculating the production term in the k and epsilon equations. As you know the production term involves calculating u and v gradients with respect to x and y at the center of the volumes. Now, and can be easily found from central differencing: , but i can't find an easy way for finding and , since we don't have the u velocities at north and south faces and v velocities at east and west faces. Sure I can find these gradients on the corners of the volumes and then average them. But I don't think this is a systematic way and whether this will ruin the whole conservativeness property of the scheme??? I have been thinking about this problem for several weeks now, but I think I lack the knowledge and experience for finding a goodway out of it. Any help is appreciated. |
|
Tags |
finite volume, k-epsilon, production term, staggered grid, turbulence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |
How can i apply staggered grid method in circular domain? | heisenbergg | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 1, 2010 18:05 |
Please help: SIMPLE algorithm on staggered grid | cfd_guy | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 12, 2010 13:03 |
GRID TO GRID INTERPOLATION in FLUENT | calogero | FLUENT | 3 | June 4, 2003 09:32 |
Troubles modelling flow through a grid | Hans Klaufus | CFX | 1 | June 28, 2000 17:43 |