|
[Sponsors] |
Comparing spallart-allmaras, k-epsilon, k-omega models |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 30, 2011, 15:45 |
Comparing spallart-allmaras, k-epsilon, k-omega models
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi all,
I've performed several analyses of flow over a symmetrical wing profile using Star-ccm and used three different turbulent models (RANS: spallart-allamaras, k-epsilon and k-omega models). From the results all 3 give almost identical velocity vector plots but begin to differ for pressure and turbulent viscosity plots. I was wondering if anyone can explain why the peak pressure at the front of the wing is higher for spallart-allmaras then for both k-epsilon and k-omega models? The results for turbulent viscosity around the airfoil are also very different between k-epsilon and k-omega models. The turbulent viscosity values for the k-epsilon model change a lot from the surface of the wing to the domain boundary but the k-omega model there is an almost zero value surrounding the wing and then changes value. Wondering if anyone knows why the k-omega values close to the surface are all identical? Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bounding epsilon or bounding omega | Stylianos | OpenFOAM | 8 | February 23, 2018 14:41 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 4, 2017 09:30 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 21:21 |
extracting K and Epsilon from Spalart Allmaras | Sundar | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 31, 2006 03:02 |
comparing different models and grids | Philipp | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 31, 2001 05:14 |