|
[Sponsors] |
May 27, 1999, 08:53 |
Non-Reflecting B.C. in NSC2KE
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I has used unstructured FVM public code NSC2KE to simulate a traveling shock of Ms=1.5 (actually I used 2D grid to simulate 1D shock ),the outflow B.C. used NSC2KE's Steger-Warming method . So this problem is a subsonic problem and post-shock mach number < 1 . Before the shock went out of outflow B.C. the result is very good , but when the shock went out my result is very poor because the B.C. reflecting was so big that there was a density and pressure down. Then I used Thompson's non-reflecting B.C. , but the result is also poor .Could anyone help me to deal with the outgoing boundary conditions ? Thanks. |
|
May 27, 1999, 10:45 |
Re: Non-Reflecting B.C. in NSC2KE
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
May I suggest you to read the discussion Oleg and I had yesterday on 'BC problem'. It treats boundary conditions through the method of Characteristics. Let me know if you need more details and/or references to the litterature. Cheers, PG. |
|
May 27, 1999, 22:26 |
Re: Non-Reflecting B.C. in NSC2KE
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Thanks for your help ! The problem has been solved by Thompson's non-reflecting B.C. (J.C.P 68,1-24,1987) using a characteristic method . I made a foolish mistake so the result is poor because I didn't convert the primitive form to conservative form . Now everything is good for subsonic and supersonic , although there is a little reflection about the most one persent and I should put this B.C. to un-regular geometry . |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confusion between 'non-slip' and 'slip' B.C | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 6, 2008 05:56 |
Non Reflecting B.C. | Alshroof | CFX | 2 | July 31, 2007 21:34 |
how to set such B.C. in Fluent? | Sherri | FLUENT | 1 | January 12, 2006 13:32 |
Urgent! Help on UDF to set B.C. of 3rd type | Ray Hong | FLUENT | 0 | December 28, 2005 20:35 |
How to set B.C. of the 2nd or 3rd type in UDS? | Ray Hong | FLUENT | 0 | December 28, 2005 07:03 |