|
[Sponsors] |
December 6, 2004, 12:30 |
Smagorinsky model and Sij terms
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm currently updating a code that uses the Smagorinsky model as its sgs model. At present the code calculates Sij in the form:
Sij**2 = S11**2 + S22**2 + S33**2 + 2S12**2 + 2S13**2 + 2S23**2 in order to calculate the eddiy viscostiy. Now, as the |S| term is SQRT(2SijSij), is is clear that the Sij**2 shown above and SijSij calculated normally do not commute, so which one should I use? Is the above implmentation wrong? Thanks, James |
|
December 6, 2004, 15:32 |
Re: Smagorinsky model and Sij terms
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think the above implementation is correct. Sij**2 = Sij:Sij = Sij*Sji
|
|
December 6, 2004, 20:24 |
Re: Smagorinsky model and Sij terms
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It all depends on the definitions of S11, S22, S12, etc. in the code. The equation you have written is neither wrong nor right; you have simply not provided sufficient information.
This is a two minute exercise in algebra. You know Sij = {ui,j + uj,i}/2 and Sij*Sij simply uses the repeated index notation. You can then verify by yourself whether your code is right or wrong Adrin Gharakhani |
|
December 7, 2004, 11:20 |
Re: Smagorinsky model and Sij terms
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The current code in indeed correct. I should try to remember how tensor notation works!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modified k-e turbulence model UDF | Travis | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | November 11, 2018 21:21 |
Implementation of Germano-Lilly model in LES | Andrew McMullan | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2016 18:32 |
Implementing new turbulence model | sven | OpenFOAM | 13 | October 12, 2009 14:18 |
Reynolds transport, turbulence model, etc | Beginner | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 7, 2009 06:36 |