|
[Sponsors] |
December 22, 2010, 13:58 |
Question on runge-Kutta scheme
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I'm trying to solve a low Mach number, variable density flow using SIMPLER algorithm of Patankar. It's an unsteady problem where I've used first order Euler backward scheme for the time discretisation. I use a time-marching technique to advance the solution in time. I'm wondering whether it is possible to implement a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme together with SIMPLER. THanks. |
|
December 22, 2010, 14:40 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 20 |
The backward Euler scheme is actually a particularization of a Runge-Kutta scheme (order 1). In principle you can use a Runge-Kutta scheme for the time discretization.
|
|
December 24, 2010, 21:48 |
the potential problem of RK method
|
#3 |
Member
|
as it is unsteady problem ,
your starting point should be higher accuracy in time. but if you use high order RK method of, or AB method is the same, assuming you using explicit version then there is a limitation of time step for stability consideration... so , if you need higher accuracy, three time level method should be a good choice in fact, the whole accuracy should both consider spatial and temporal terms if it is second order in spatial, there is no need for 4th order temporal scheme |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AUSM scheme ? Central Scheme | boling | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 7, 2016 03:41 |
2N Storage runge kutta | Vasanth | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 2, 2005 11:44 |
Question about meshing / solution scheme of CFX | Coriolius | CFX | 8 | August 1, 2004 19:39 |
Scheme documentation and question | Mickaël Perrin | FLUENT | 0 | July 4, 2002 06:21 |
Diagonally Dominate Runge Kutta Method | Anthony Iannetti | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 23, 2001 22:27 |