|
[Sponsors] |
November 23, 2010, 02:42 |
Still confused by LES
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I've been reading so many posts and information on the net regarding LES simulation. They all say that it involves resolving the large scales whereas the smaller scales are modelled. Does that mean the smaller eddies are simulated because isn't that what 'modelling' means. I know what LES stands for but it seems contradictory if the smaller scales are modelled and the large scales are resolved. Or maybe I have the wrong idea?? |
|
November 25, 2010, 19:29 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Thomas Larsen
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 16 |
The length of the smallest turbulence motion can be found by using kolmogorovs length scale. In DNS simulation, one solves every motion of turbulence. which requires a hugh mesh.
Since the small turbulence motion does not contribute significantly to the flow properties these are modeled up instead of resolving the directly with navier stockes like in DNS. This is what LES do. By using a larger grid size, only the large turbluence motion is resolved with navier stockes and the small ones are modelled up. This is the short story. Try reading the book " A first course in turbulence" to get a better insight. |
|
November 27, 2010, 22:14 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 16 |
Ok thanks Larsen
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to conduct transient LES simulation | tianrenshui311 | FLUENT | 0 | November 15, 2010 14:21 |
Turbulence dampening due to magnetic field in LES and RAS | eelcovv | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 8, 2010 12:35 |
LES and combustion model | Margherita Cadorin | CFX | 0 | October 29, 2008 06:24 |
LES on two phase flow | Li Yang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 12, 2004 09:10 |
Some Questions about LES. | Bin Li | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 20, 2004 10:58 |