|
[Sponsors] |
October 18, 2004, 15:22 |
Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
My question specifically concerns the satisfaction of divergence (del dot u) for a finite difference formulation of incompresible flow. I use pressure projection method (non-staggered mesh). Could anyone with experience please guide me on this? Is it possible to satisfy divergence on a non-staggered grid without any tricks involved? Thanks in advance. |
|
October 18, 2004, 15:27 |
Re: Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is only approximately divergence free on projection method because divergence of gradient is not Laplacian in the solver for efficient pressure solver.
|
|
October 18, 2004, 15:51 |
Re: Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Kim, but will this not be a problem if mass is not conserved?
|
|
October 18, 2004, 16:40 |
Re: Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So, when you deal with mass advection, you use divergence free velocity field, look at the papers about projection methods.
|
|
October 21, 2004, 15:37 |
Re: Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Are you solving the poisson equation or are you trying some pressure-correction method like the artificial compressibility? Oscar. |
|
October 22, 2004, 01:29 |
Re: Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm solving the pressure Poisson equation
|
|
November 1, 2004, 11:22 |
Re: Incompressible Finite difference Formulation
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can assume that your solution will satisfy the mass continuity (div(u)=0). For this, a non-staggered grid is better than a staggered one. Probably you will get some spurious oscillations also called wiggles. Staggering help to avoid this problem, but it is not absolute necessary.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite element vs. finite difference | Francisco Saldarriaga | Main CFD Forum | 23 | December 17, 2014 09:21 |
Finite difference can be non-conservative? | gregmason | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 8, 2009 12:53 |
Fininte difference and Finite element Technique | Mahendra Singh Mehra | FLUENT | 3 | December 23, 2005 00:49 |
finite difference method for navier-stokes problem | dallybird | Main CFD Forum | 5 | February 17, 2003 23:00 |
Oldroyd-B model using Finite Difference | Luciane Grossi | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 28, 2000 00:28 |