|
[Sponsors] |
October 5, 2004, 17:43 |
Vortex shedding
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there,
I am conducting some investigations for the vortex shedding behind blunt objects. I observed consistently that it might more physically sound if the Reynolds and Strouhal numbers are based on the vorticity rather than the conventional free stream velocity. I am wondering if anybody out there is aware of any people/paper that might support this idea? Thanks in advance. Tony |
|
October 7, 2004, 06:29 |
Re: Vortex shedding
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes you are right. St and Re numbers are better parameters. My master thesis dealt with vortex shedding in counterflowing jets and I have used the LES model.
Cheers. Davide |
|
October 7, 2004, 13:01 |
Re: Vortex shedding
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks.
Actually, I have just found my answer. The idea I proposed is consistent with the free-stream concept of Roshko A (1955) for the universal scaling of Karman-type vortex shedding. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
K-Epsilon for Vortex Shedding | Sham | FLUENT | 33 | March 29, 2017 06:48 |
Transiet Animation - vortex shedding | derz | CFX | 5 | May 10, 2010 10:21 |
Vortex shedding, FSI-analysis, turbulence numerics | tallknuseren | CFX | 3 | May 10, 2010 05:31 |
Vortex shedding behind cylider in cross flow | Muthu | FLUENT | 0 | March 6, 2006 11:29 |
basic vortex shedding | john | Main CFD Forum | 4 | November 6, 2000 14:23 |