|
[Sponsors] |
August 16, 2004, 20:24 |
Free Surface Code Validation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What validation test would you suggest for free surface (without internal boundaries) code testing?
I am interested both: in simple cases with analytical solution available and in experimental/numerical results of recent/non recent works. Best, Maciek |
|
August 17, 2004, 11:49 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Prove with some analytical solution (if exist), or with Continuity or any global integral law validation of your numeric dates.
|
|
August 17, 2004, 13:26 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I validated my free surface results in a rotating bucket where the anayltical solution is available. You can find the analytial solution in the book 'transport phenomena' and the author is Bird.
|
|
August 18, 2004, 03:48 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Would you like to suggest any existing case which has existing analytical solution?
Best, |
|
August 18, 2004, 03:49 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't have that book, but will try to find that case somwhere else. Thank you for pointing it to me,
Best, |
|
August 18, 2004, 11:05 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
First of all we have to know what are you solving.
|
|
August 18, 2004, 11:45 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Incompressible free surface on staggered grid with SIMPLE method for NS solution and markers for fluid (surface) tracking. Is that enough? There is no need to give you an information about what I am solving actually, since the code I am developming is general, not for solution to one specificc problem.
Is that enough? |
|
August 18, 2004, 16:23 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, if you don't especify any particular flow, analytical solutions are available for the round jet (Schlichting) and boundary layer (Blasius) flow. But those are for pressure gradient zero. All of them are self-similar solutions.
|
|
August 18, 2004, 18:24 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The following paper also uses rotating bucket as the testing case and the analytical solution in listed in this paper.
@article{Cairncross2000, title = {A Finite Element Method for Free Surface Flows of Incompressible Fluids in Three Dimensions. Part I. Boundary Fitted Mesh Motion}, author = {Cairncross, R. A. and Schunk, P. R. and Baer, T. A. and Rao, R. R. and Sackinger, P. A.}, journal = {Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids }, volume = {33}, pages = {375--403}, year = {2000} } |
|
August 18, 2004, 18:39 |
Re: Free Surface Code Validation
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you, VERY much!
Maciek |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF Defining VOF Free Surface at Outlet | Alex | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 13 | August 8, 2012 17:50 |
CFX convergence issues with free surface | adenlan | CFX | 3 | September 2, 2011 07:43 |
Design Integration with CFD? | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 19 | May 17, 2001 16:56 |
Code with reliable free surface capability in a rotating system | Subhasish Roy Choudhury | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 4, 1998 19:47 |
Modeling Free Surface Flows | Elliot Schwartz | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 25, 1998 22:03 |