|
[Sponsors] |
August 11, 2004, 05:46 |
Turb. modeling
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am fairly new in CFD. I wrote 2D cell-centered finite volume NS solver employing Roe FDS and Baldwin-Lomax model. However, I have covergence problems. Some research engineers compute eddy viscosity in every 5-6 iterations. Do you think it works well for better convergence? Thanks in advance...
Keanu. |
|
August 19, 2004, 08:00 |
Re: Turb. modeling
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there,
I believe that a better way to smooth-out convergence problems is to include relaxation, rather than skip to compute the eddy-viscosity. Thus, compute the eddy-viscosity each iteration however update it as: mu_t_new=alpha*mu_t_new+(1-alpha)*mu_t_old This scheme can be applied to a number of variables. Another way to test is to compute a simple non-turbulent flow, and exclude the Baldin-Lomax model. There might be some problems with the momentum equation rather than the turbulence equation, Cheers Jonas |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
May Focus Area: Turbulence Modeling | Jonas Larsson | CFD-Wiki | 0 | May 2, 2006 12:48 |
Modeling Flow/Saturation/Absorption in Fibers | Gene Dougherty | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 6, 2003 15:49 |
Solid Modeling | Chris | Main CFD Forum | 10 | July 2, 2002 08:12 |
CFD Modeling of Two-phase Flow in Small Dia.Tubes | Eric Poindexter | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 22, 2000 10:21 |
Extrusion Modeling | Elliot Schwartz | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 11, 1998 20:08 |