|
[Sponsors] |
August 6, 2004, 08:05 |
Jameson & Steady Solutions
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm having problems with the Jameson scheme. I have already used it for external flows, and I found it was really good for steady state calculations. Now I' m using it in a finite difference method for cylindrical coordinates. It seems unable to "hold" a steady solution, I mean, even if the initial condition is an Euler steady solution (basiclally I m fixing a balance between centrifugal force and pressure gradient), and this steady solution is stable, the solution after a while seems to diverge. CAn anyone suggest me what's happening?
|
|
August 9, 2004, 14:35 |
Re: Jameson & Steady Solutions
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi!
The Euler equations maybe not sufficient to you solve your problem. YouŽll try add the viscous terms? If you have a centrifigal force, you must use the roting frame terms, where the coriollis force is present. Regards, Takachi |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solver for transonic flow? | Martin Hegedus | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 22 | December 16, 2015 05:59 |
How to determine whether flow is steady or unstead | Maliya,Barth | Main CFD Forum | 7 | October 7, 2006 03:26 |
steady or unsteady? (in dpm) | winnie | FLUENT | 1 | April 28, 2003 12:30 |
Steady solutions in Airfoil Computation? | Tyler Sherk | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 12, 2002 12:08 |
Steady state formulation of turbulence ?? | Jitendra | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 27, 2000 19:49 |