|
[Sponsors] |
August 4, 2010, 17:19 |
Discretization and convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
Karan Anand
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi
I have a model where the turbine blades are cooled internally. The discretization to NS equation was first performed with 1st order upwind for momentum, energy and viscous model chosen (k-w SST) and standard for pressure. The solution converged with residual set to 1e-4 for all except 1e-6 for energy. I also have mass avrged pressure, velocity and temperature monitors at outlet. After the solution converged (just with residual criteria, surface monitors are still varying), to get more accurate results, I switched to Second order upwind for all except pressure which was left as standard and reducing the relaxation factors. this time monitoring both residuals and surface monitors. I ran the simulation for a while with 'none' as convergence criteria. I have a couple of questions: Firstly, I plotted the residuals and surface monitors. In the velocity monitor, the velocity has almost stabilized, but there exists a few wiggles (extremely minor oscillations). Can I consider the solution to be converged (all other monitors are flat, and converged) ? Is this expected for the discretization method chosen? Also, the residual for energy did not satisfy the 1e-6 mark, can i still say the solution is converged? (I have added a few pics for the grid and convergence history) Secondly, Could doing this help? -> Instead of changing the discretization to 2nd order upwind, I first change it to Power law from 1st order upwind. As far as i remember , power law is 1st order accurate but it is way less diffusive and it seems quite similar to hybrid differencing scheme. Is the solution obtained here good enough? After I switch to power law, I come back to 2nd order, which is a higher order scheme. Could this reduce the wiggles, or help me approach a converged solution? I thought of going for QUICK, but i have a lot of tet meshes. Other info: The solver is Steady state -SIMPLE scheme for the staggered grid. The model has no significant curvature , nor high values of natural convection. Grid is Hybrid with hex core and tetra around. Have a prism boundary layer at the airfoil surface. Entire meshed domain is fluid. Grid is conformal. Images for grid: (coarse mesh) http://img85.imageshack.us/gal.php?g...meshstrctu.jpg Images for convergence (a bit refined mesh and better transition between mesh regions-i didn't add images for them, but you get the basic idea from above) http://img651.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=residual.png |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence question with regards to discretization | karananand | FLUENT | 8 | July 16, 2010 15:49 |
Convergence question with regards to discretization | karananand | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 16, 2010 01:27 |
Convergence problems | Chetan | FLUENT | 3 | April 15, 2004 20:13 |
Convergence Problem | Johnny B | FLUENT | 5 | November 4, 2003 17:01 |
CAVITATION (convergence criteria & discretization) | ROOZBEH | FLUENT | 1 | October 6, 2003 10:32 |