CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Question on Sediment Mass Conservation Scheme

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 6, 2004, 16:45
Default Question on Sediment Mass Conservation Scheme
  #1
Wen Long
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear CFD friends:

I got question on solving a very simple sea bottom sediment mass conservation equation using Finite Difference, can you give me hint on which scheme to use?

The problem is to simulation the elevation change of sea bottom near shore due to waves and currents.

The equation for sea bottom elevation look like:

d(zb)/dt= - d(qb)/dx

for 1D case, where zb is sea bottom elevation, and qb is volume transport rate of sands/sediments. Usually qb is calculated using near bottom fluid velocities. Say qb=A*ub^3 with A a coefficient.

The problem been that I'm using wave phase resolving method to predict near bottom velocities, so that ub=ub(x,t) is instantaneous, and have both positive value and negative value in a wave period. So does transport rate qb.

It's very hard to relate qb to zb in functional form, so it's not easy to use Lax-Wendroff scheme directly. Maybe some modified version of Lax-Wendroff scheme will be okay. Any suggestions?

FTCS scheme will be definitely unstable. I tend to find some upwind scheme. Question is that, which direction is upwind? Can I use sign of qb to judge that? Also, can I use dx more than a wavelength? I mean can we discretize with step larger than the length scale of the qb(x,t) oscillation? ("wind" changes direction in a wave length)

I'm looking for bedlevel change over a month. Then, suppose that we can use time averaged(hourly average) equation, right?

Then equation becomes

d<zb>/dt= -d<qb>/dx

The time average <qb> should not have fluctuation in x and time less then the scale of wavelength and wave period, right? Then in this case, we should be able to use dx lareger than wavelength.

But I really don't see difference in the two equations as far as time integration is concerned.

Thank you in advance, and I'm waiting for your input.

Wen

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Mass conservation in COMSOL Diego COMSOL 1 December 27, 2010 06:14
Mass conservation problem in mixing tank multiphase simulation rockewan FLUENT 0 April 6, 2010 13:34
Mass conservation law violation in stationary case vitmalin FLUENT 0 August 27, 2007 04:07
Two-phase mass conservation ? Michael R. Rasmussen CFX 3 September 1, 2000 09:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:10.