|
[Sponsors] |
Finite Elements vs Finite Difference Vs Finite Volumes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 9, 2010, 15:00 |
Finite Elements vs Finite Difference Vs Finite Volumes
|
#1 |
New Member
Christos
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 |
I guess no introduction is needed. Although I had studied for a long time the properties and the "structure" of these methods I still face a difficulty. I cannot really spot for what reason the "best" CFD solvers use FV ? I can understand FD doesn't make use any of physics, it's purely mathematical like in signal analysis. But on the other hand FE is generic and I can't see any disadvantage over FV (for sure FV is subset of the former...) Anyone more experienced? 'cause I don't want to take it for granted without knowing the REAL *WHY*
Thanx all for reading |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite element vs. finite difference | Francisco Saldarriaga | Main CFD Forum | 23 | December 17, 2014 09:21 |
Finite volumes vs. finite elements: applications | Lionel S. | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 22, 2007 11:51 |
Fininte difference and Finite element Technique | Mahendra Singh Mehra | FLUENT | 3 | December 23, 2005 00:49 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |
Finite Volumes over Finite Elements? | Uve | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 27, 2000 12:05 |