|
[Sponsors] |
Transient movement of fluid front at outlet of a water tap |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 8, 2010, 04:10 |
Transient movement of fluid front at outlet rim of a water tap
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi there,
I would like to model somekind of water tap. I am especially interested in the conditions at the outlet. If the wall is modelled as a wall and not just as a plane I will get adhesive forces. These forces will cause the fluid to attach (see picture). In case of a transient laminar calculation the front of the fluid, where fluid, solid, and gas meet will move until all forces are in balance. The problem I am faced with is the fact of no slip conditions at the wall. How would I be able to allow the movement of the front but still conform the boco of zero velocity? I think I would have to model microscopic forces. Is there another way than applying a multiscale modelling? Any help would be much appreciated Last edited by mannobot; June 8, 2010 at 05:08. |
|
June 16, 2010, 05:57 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 |
Sorry I'm a bit late.
May be this could help you. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...4XZb950QQyZ21g It's a tutorial from Hassan_Hemida_VOF |
|
June 16, 2010, 13:40 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Stefan,
thank you very much for your reply. I will read the material and try to understand. Maybe we can stay in touch in case of arising problems. Sincerely mannobot |
|
June 16, 2010, 18:22 |
liquid front
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
|
Use commercial or own CFD multiphase code: run VOF model as suggested. Its a matter of minutes before you see results !
For good understanding in the near wall region at the exit, refine the mesh well and input proper surface tension values. You will get curvatures (if you have resolved the region well) of the liquid attachign to the walls. No microscopic effects needed: CFD modeling has already averaged them for your convinience. Thanks, /CFDtoy Quote:
__________________
CFDtoy |
||
June 17, 2010, 04:23 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear CFDtoy,
so you think I will get a moving front? These must be a result of capillary forces. I thought the no slip condition at the wall has to cause problems. That is what I was told. Sincerely Mannobot |
|
June 17, 2010, 17:24 |
water front
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
well yes...here are the input required
1. inlet velocity of the tap water - if the velocity is too low (rayleigh regime) we are looking at drops. Now, if the capillary forces are high (surface tension effects) and at the same time inlet velocity is too low...drop just sticks there...does not "drop". This is probably what you want to see?? if so, check your inlet velocity: there are tons of literature on the breakup regimes...rayleigh, first wind induced, second, turbulent breakup etc with this inlet velocity, you have a Re and for a given liquid, the weber number ..these 2 will tell you waht kind of regime you are in ..and in theory, if the reynolds number increases and the force term becomes > surface tension force, the droplet will move downstream..if not ..it will stick there.. hope this helps. regards, /CFDtoy
__________________
CFDtoy |
|
June 18, 2010, 04:40 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear CDFtoy,
thank you for your immediate response. Please do excuse the lack of crarity within my explainations. I added to possible scenarios. Both are depending on the fluid properties imaginable. I want to observe wether or not the contact line does wet the outlet-wall and how far it does move. I marked the point I do define as contact line. I hope this explaination helps to clarify my problem. I know the contact angle is not displayed physical correct but I think it will work. Thank you so much for your time. Sincerely Mannobot |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method | Suzzn | CFX | 21 | January 29, 2018 01:58 |
air bubble is disappear increasing time using vof | xujjun | CFX | 9 | June 9, 2009 08:59 |
error using combination of step function | xujjun | CFX | 1 | January 15, 2008 17:46 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |
Front tracking | Don Hawken | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 12, 1999 14:29 |