|
[Sponsors] |
I think there is no industrial/commerical code can |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 18, 2004, 14:32 |
I think there is no industrial/commerical code can
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
capture the velocity and kinetic energy near-wall boundary layers, for examples, inner layers or even buffer-layers, so no-slip bounday conditions make no sense for all turbulence modeling. Do you think so?
|
|
May 18, 2004, 14:36 |
Re: I think there is no industrial/commerical code
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
correction: sublays not inner layer.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The FOAM Documentation Project - SHUT-DOWN | holger_marschall | OpenFOAM | 242 | March 7, 2013 13:30 |
How to make code run in parallel? | cwang5 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | May 30, 2011 05:47 |
Open Source Vs Commercial Software | MechE | OpenFOAM | 28 | May 16, 2011 12:02 |
Small 3-D code | Zdravko Stojanovic | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 19, 2010 11:11 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 12:44 |