|
[Sponsors] |
Residue of FD scheme doesn't fall to machine zero? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 4, 2004, 12:31 |
Residue of FD scheme doesn't fall to machine zero?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all, I wish to enquire something about FD schemes.
I am solving an incompressible viscous steady state flow using a finite difference, fractional step method on the Navier Stokes equations on a non-staggered grid. I use the SOR method to solve for the Pressure Poisson equation. I realise that my momentum residues and mass residue (using the momentum and continuity equations) do not fall to machine zero. Instead, most often the residues will only drop to magnitudes of around order 10^-3 to 10^-5. Is this because that finite difference schemes are essentially non-conservative in nature? Thank you! |
|
May 5, 2004, 01:38 |
Re: Residue of FD scheme doesn't fall to machine z
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A common cause for failure of convergence is the use of non-differentiable limiters like min-max. Are you using some sort of limiter ? Also look at the L<sub>∞</sub> residue and find where the maximum change is taking place. That might shed some light on your problem.
|
|
May 12, 2004, 03:56 |
Re: Residue of FD scheme doesn't fall to machine z
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I don't believe I'm using any limiters, and the residues don't really show anything significant. So it is possible for residues to fall to machine zero using finite difference? Or does the use of a non-staggered, collocated grid cause the "non-conservativeness"? |
|
May 12, 2004, 05:46 |
Re: Residue of FD scheme doesn't fall to machine z
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Non-conservativity need not be the cause of failure to converge (in terms of residue fall). There are huge number of finite difference schemes that do give good residue convergence.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme | iilw1314 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 12, 2022 13:29 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
Distributed Parallel on dual core remote machine | Justin | CFX | 1 | February 3, 2008 18:23 |
extrapolation in MUSCL scheme | Chandra | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 14, 2007 12:21 |
PC vs. Workstation | Tim Franke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 29, 1999 16:01 |