|
[Sponsors] |
April 26, 2004, 00:30 |
stability of SIMPLE?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am trying to write my own SIMPLEC based code for solving a general 2-D flow problem on a rectangular domain. When solving for velocities from the guessed pressure using the momentum equations, I need to invert a matrix that is tri-diagonal. How I can I be assured that the matrix is strictly diagonally dominant? How can I be assured that my differencing is numerically stable? Very often I get large oscillations in my solution (mostly, when convection is much larger than diffusion). Is there some good book that describes the numerical theory of Navier Stokes? I have been reading Patankar and Malalasekara.
|
|
April 26, 2004, 05:40 |
Re: stability of SIMPLE?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
1) check condition
[Sum(Anb)]/Ap <= 1. It's a wideknown rule from Patankar Also look Lectures Notes by David Apsley and Lars Davidson 2) Check scheme of approximation 3) Add under-relaxation 4) drop me the copy of Your code |
|
April 26, 2004, 05:42 |
Re: stability of SIMPLE?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And check B.C.
|
|
April 26, 2004, 06:21 |
Re: stability of SIMPLE?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Before solving something very complicated - run next test cases
1) free flow with free boundaries 2) free flow over the flat plate 3) free developed flow between two plates |
|
April 26, 2004, 06:29 |
Re: stability of SIMPLE?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
One good test for stability for all kinds of schemes is the test of Runge for different levels of approximation. If the estimation values are equal at all points then your scheme is numericaly stable (you must prove this for both stationary and non - stationary cases). If there are any variations in this value then you have some additional approximation error (like scheme viscosity) due to the approximation scheme - not to the mechanical equations, there are some methods that can correct this.
|
|
April 27, 2004, 05:24 |
Re: stability of SIMPLE?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
there is a book by Peric on CFD ,
i found that book better help than Malas. or patanker. check that out if it helps. |
|
April 29, 2004, 11:17 |
Re: stability of SIMPLE?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just another reference in addition to the aforementioned ones: Hirsch C. "Numerical computation of internal and external flows, Volume 1: Fundamentals of numerical discretisation, Volume 2: Computational methods for inviscid and viscous flows", John Willey & Sons, 1990
This is one of the best references for CFD numerics. Regards George |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates | zouchu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2014 18:02 |
How to add correcting pressure equation in SIMPLE of MRFSimpleFOAM? | renyun0511 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | November 4, 2010 02:38 |
Making SIMPLE converge faster | Fabio | Main CFD Forum | 4 | April 9, 2006 12:35 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 07:54 |
flow over a 2D cyl using SIMPLE | T | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 27, 2001 08:32 |