|
[Sponsors] |
February 5, 2004, 13:09 |
Memory stack-Fortran vs Windows XP
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I have been running our code up to 1.5GB RAM size in my computer. It has 2.56GB RAM available. I have tried unsuccesfully to run a 2.06GB simulation and Windows XP gives the error: it is not a win32 application. Does anyone know how to make Windows XP go over 2GB RAM?
Thanks!! Mikel Alonso |
|
February 5, 2004, 14:28 |
Re: Memory stack-Fortran vs Windows XP
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hola
What's the (company) name of the Fortran compiler your're using in Windows XP? /Raul |
|
February 5, 2004, 19:23 |
Re: Memory stack-Fortran vs Windows XP
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If I remember correctly, Windows will only allow 2GB max for a single process... you may have to use Linux or a 64bit CPU/OS to exceed this limit (e.g., maybe try a Athlon 64 / Opteron running 64bit Linux, or a 64bit Sun/HP Unix workstation).
|
|
February 6, 2004, 03:31 |
Re: Memory stack-Fortran vs Windows XP
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Compaq Fortran, 6.6b
|
|
February 6, 2004, 03:33 |
Re: Memory stack-Fortran vs Windows XP
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Marcus. I am going to use Linux. It seems like the best short term solution.
|
|
February 10, 2004, 09:15 |
Re: Memory stack-Fortran vs Windows XP
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I had the same problem and I migrated on Linux !!
Steve |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
memory ms visual fortran 6 | vadim | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 20, 2008 14:01 |
Phase locked average in run time | panara | OpenFOAM | 2 | February 20, 2008 15:37 |
CFX CPU time & real time | Nick Strantzias | CFX | 8 | July 23, 2006 18:50 |
Integer stack memory size | Twiti | CFX | 2 | December 22, 2004 08:38 |
Stack frame size, Origin 2000, fortran, a question. | Sergei Chernyshenko | Main CFD Forum | 4 | February 22, 1999 15:24 |