 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
January 23, 2004, 00:02
|
Software (which is good)
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am looking at using software to observe passive ventilation in buildings and I am unsure which software is the best to use.
I have tried flovent from flomerics which works o.k until the accuracy of the results is increased but from there it goes crazy I should note I am looking at something which requires only simplistic input variables (not geometry)as I do not have large amounts of time to spend to learn to use the program suggestions please, |
|
|
||
|
January 23, 2004, 10:18
|
Re: Software (which is good)
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
accuracy of the results is increased.... what are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
||
|
January 23, 2004, 11:20
|
Re: Software (which is good)
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How long is not long when it comes to learning the package?
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help in proper CFD software | AMusteykis | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 6, 2009 09:28 |
| [Commercial meshers] An open source software like gambit | ilpaso | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | June 18, 2008 17:32 |
| CFD Software Sales position in Northern CA | Mary Storms | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 17, 2007 10:09 |
| [blockMesh] Is blockMesh generally considered a good quality tool | york | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | November 15, 2006 14:42 |
| Visualization Software for CFD | Paul | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 25, 2006 18:16 |
Linear Mode
