|
[Sponsors] |
Benchmarking a Compressible Code (Low Mach Number Formulation) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 23, 2009, 02:00 |
Benchmarking a Compressible Code (Low Mach Number Formulation)
|
#1 |
New Member
Luis
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello CFD community,
I have a finite difference, staggered grid, semi-implicit code. It solves both the momemtum and the energy equation with the low-mach number formulation. I am looking into developing a benchmark test to validate upcoming compressibility developments. For now I am just focusing on laminar flow. I would appreciate any information on classical benchmarks for this type of developments. (I am looking through the textbooks for something like a analytical solution of Poiselle flow but with compressibility...but I cannot find it!, ) Thanks, Luis |
|
November 27, 2009, 22:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 17 |
Viscous fluid flow by White had some analytical expressions for Blasius flatplate flow. Also look for fluid mechanics book by Landau and Lifshitz. They have a lot of analytical solutions.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[mesh manipulation] Mesh Refinement | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 42 | January 8, 2017 13:55 |
acoustics and low mach number | George | Main CFD Forum | 42 | November 3, 2005 07:05 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
TVD scheme at low Mach number | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 6, 1999 03:01 |
CFD code for very low Re Flow | Raj | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 31, 1999 23:06 |