Sloshing Problem methods.. .mesh motion and Source term

lostin4ever · November 19, 2009, 09:41

Hi all,

I am simulating tank sloshing problem in Fluent and OpenFoam both. In fluent I am adding a source term in tank motion direction and in openfoam I am using mesh motion. My results are quite different in both the case. But I would say results of openfoam seems to be right if I match these with observed experimental data.

Can someone say is it correct to substitute the motion with source term? if yes than what one can do to have more correct results?

sabbasi_mr · December 1, 2009, 02:02

Did you model the motion via source term? I mean changed the gravitational acceleration with time? For example in x direction? and if yes, how did you do that?

November 19, 2009, 09:41	Sloshing Problem methods.. .mesh motion and Source term	#1
lostin4ever New Member lostin Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: India Posts: 12 Rep Power: 17	Hi all, I am simulating tank sloshing problem in Fluent and OpenFoam both. In fluent I am adding a source term in tank motion direction and in openfoam I am using mesh motion. My results are quite different in both the case. But I would say results of openfoam seems to be right if I match these with observed experimental data. Can someone say is it correct to substitute the motion with source term? if yes than what one can do to have more correct results?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Moving mesh	Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom)	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	122	June 15, 2014 07:20
Source term in NS eqns	zonexo	Main CFD Forum	5	February 3, 2006 18:33
Automatic Mesh Motion solver	michele	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	10	September 26, 2005 09:21

December 1, 2009, 02:02		#2
sabbasi_mr New Member Saeed Abbasi Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Iran Posts: 20 Rep Power: 17	Did you model the motion via source term? I mean changed the gravitational acceleration with time? For example in x direction? and if yes, how did you do that?