|
[Sponsors] |
December 4, 2003, 11:03 |
Central Difference Navier Stokes
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does anybody have any information on the stability criteria for the one dimensional Navier Stokes equations discretised with a second order central difference scheme without artificial dissipation? I realise that it's a non-linear stability problem, but are there any useful solutions apart from those gained through the model convection-diffusion equation?
|
|
December 4, 2003, 11:43 |
Re: Central Difference Navier Stokes
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Grid Peclet Number = Pe = (pu)/(G/dx) < 2 where: p=density (kg/m^3) u=velocity, assuming uniform on one cell end to the other cell end (m/s) G=diffusion coeff. (kg/m/s) dx=characteristic cell width
For a given physical situation, if one is in violation of that criteria, then there's no choice but to reduce 'dx'. This will increase resource demands, however. Artificial dissipation is not a concern in general for 2nd order C.D. schemes; the main issue is balancing stability and resource constraints. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Filtered navier stokes equation..LES:: | Palani Velladurai | Main CFD Forum | 7 | September 6, 2013 03:51 |
Adding a term to Navier Stokes Equation | ashtonJ | CFX | 3 | January 15, 2011 07:32 |
Specified Blend factor =1 Vs Central Difference | Kushagra | CFX | 4 | May 2, 2008 14:14 |
Navier stokes compresible viscid flow fea, somebody can help? | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 24, 2003 03:28 |
Newbie:Viscoelasticity and Navier stokes equation | Rajil Saraswat | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 9, 2003 08:21 |