|
[Sponsors] |
September 27, 2009, 23:54 |
why my simulation not convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
labib
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 17 |
i simulate airfoil using K-W turbulence model. i set the turbulence intensity about 0.05%, and turbulent length scale 0.0001, when i simulate with angle of attack with range -4 to 8 deggre can convergence. but when increasing the angle of attack with 10 up to 16 cannot convergence..iam using second order upwind scheme, chord length 1 m, and with velocity inlet 2.5 m/s, the properties of air is standard. why with larger of angle of attack 10 deggre this is cannot convergence...help me..please..thanks
|
|
September 28, 2009, 01:19 |
|
#2 |
New Member
gaurav
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
which Analysis software are you using? try to run a time accurate mode and see if you get a good result.
|
|
September 28, 2009, 22:52 |
|
#3 |
New Member
labib
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 17 |
i using fluent 6.2.16..
I've tried using coupled solution, and the parameters under relaxation factor was my volatile but still could not converging...whether there should be justified? |
|
September 28, 2009, 23:27 |
|
#4 |
New Member
gaurav
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
Fluent can run only a second order scheme and from what information I have gathered from my professor u need to run the third and fifth order at this high angle of attack as there are a lot of viscous effects that are not considered in the 2nd order.
|
|
September 29, 2009, 07:23 |
|
#5 |
New Member
labib
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 17 |
simulation at a high angle of attack could be convergent with the first order scheme, but the result is less precise.and I have done the validation of a low angle of attack with a second order scheme and the results are better than the first order scheme.
whether to use segregated or coupled solution, which is better for the simulation Airfoil with low Reynolds numbers, please advice |
|
October 2, 2009, 15:36 |
|
#6 | ||
New Member
Josh
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Quote:
Converging the residuals with the first order scheme may feel good, but it is probably not a physically relevant solution if the higher order scheme doesn't converge too. |
|||
October 2, 2009, 16:03 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
franz
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
hi
with big separation bubbles the solution becomes unsteady because physically the bubble will move and your time marching scheme will follow this behaviour do not play with fluent options to make the bubble stable, run unsteady the low tu level says to the code that you are looking for almost a laminar solution, it is not surprising a big bubble Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem | Sal | FLUENT | 8 | December 17, 2014 08:46 |
How stop simulation if convergence is not reached? | Andreas | FLUENT | 0 | October 16, 2007 13:35 |
strange simulation error | Ralf Schmidt | FLUENT | 2 | May 4, 2007 14:02 |
convergence for an Unsteady simulation | Palani Velladurai | FLUENT | 1 | March 19, 2007 11:56 |
Combustion Convergence problems | Art Stretton | Phoenics | 5 | April 2, 2002 06:59 |