Wall temperature define in fluent

zdz198728 · September 22, 2009, 12:53

Hi, guys:
If I put adiabatic wall temperature boundary condition, combustion happened around the wall. Should the wall temperature equal to fluid temperature when the case reach to steady state? From my case , the answer is no. So Could anyone help me to explain this?thanks

ztdep · September 23, 2009, 00:58

radiation?

zdz198728 · September 23, 2009, 11:14

I keep radiation on, however, the emissivy I set is zero.

Charles Rundle · November 19, 2009, 01:37

Hello,

If I may ask, is there any reason that you set the wall's emissivity to zero? I am assuming that the radiation model was left on to account for radiation given off by the combustion and the medium is treated as participating.

I would expect that the default radiation settings would probably use the emissivity for the absorptivity as well. Which means that your walls are being treated a perfect reflector. Any radiation generated will be reflected back thought the fluid until the fluid absorbs it all again. This may be exactly what you are looking for in which case ignore this part. As I mentioned before combustion is not my area of expertise.

Also how uniform is your fluid temperature? The net radiation flux is zero; to be adiabatic the wall only has to be the same temperature as the fluid adjacent to the wall. There may be a very sharp gradient in temperature near the wall which allows for a substantial difference between bulk fluid temperature and wall temperature despite being adiabatic.

I hope this is helpful and I haven't covered material you already know. Have a good day.

CAR

September 22, 2009, 12:53	Wall temperature define in fluent	#1
zdz198728 New Member Dezhi Zheng Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 8 Rep Power: 17	Hi, guys: If I put adiabatic wall temperature boundary condition, combustion happened around the wall. Should the wall temperature equal to fluid temperature when the case reach to steady state? From my case , the answer is no. So Could anyone help me to explain this?thanks

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[Commercial meshers] Fluent3DMeshToFoam	simvun	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	50	January 19, 2020 16:33
[blockMesh] StitchMesh on two patches	anita	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	31	April 4, 2013 12:51
udf variable for wall temperature	Kiran	FLUENT	0	July 31, 2008 09:31
how to get the change of temperature of a wall	shoeb	Siemens	2	November 30, 2004 14:44
Multicomponent fluid	Andrea	CFX	2	October 11, 2004 06:12

September 23, 2009, 00:58		#2
ztdep Senior Member p ding Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 427 Rep Power: 19	radiation?

September 23, 2009, 11:14		#3
zdz198728 New Member Dezhi Zheng Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 8 Rep Power: 17	I keep radiation on, however, the emissivy I set is zero.

November 19, 2009, 01:37		#4
Charles Rundle New Member Charles Rundle Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 17	Hello, If I may ask, is there any reason that you set the wall's emissivity to zero? I am assuming that the radiation model was left on to account for radiation given off by the combustion and the medium is treated as participating. I would expect that the default radiation settings would probably use the emissivity for the absorptivity as well. Which means that your walls are being treated a perfect reflector. Any radiation generated will be reflected back thought the fluid until the fluid absorbs it all again. This may be exactly what you are looking for in which case ignore this part. As I mentioned before combustion is not my area of expertise. Also how uniform is your fluid temperature? The net radiation flux is zero; to be adiabatic the wall only has to be the same temperature as the fluid adjacent to the wall. There may be a very sharp gradient in temperature near the wall which allows for a substantial difference between bulk fluid temperature and wall temperature despite being adiabatic. I hope this is helpful and I haven't covered material you already know. Have a good day. CAR