CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

k-omega model and boundary layer

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 19, 2003, 07:33
Default k-omega model and boundary layer
  #1
K S Chang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I want to validate the code in the turbulent boundary layer. The validation problem is referred in NPARC site.

My code is incompressbile, the scheme is hybrid, time is intergrated in the second order. The initial condition is freestream velocity and freestream turbulent quantities. And then, the results are compared.

In the plot of y+ and u+ , the velocity profile is underpredicted in log-law region. In viscos sublayer, the profile is agreement with the experimental data. The slope is same with the experimental data. However the C value is lower than data.

I don't know this region. k-eq. and omega-eq is discretized in hybrid scheme. Is this problem?? Or grid number is problem (y+_1 <= 1 settled) I have changed the frestream turbulent quantites, however the results is same.

If you konw this regions, let me know please.

In advance, thank you
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2003, 08:28
Default Re: k-omega model and boundary layer
  #2
Jonas Bredberg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi there,

Some k-omega models have problem with boundary layer flows, and especially deciding the freestream value of omega. I'm surprised that you didn't see an effect when changed the freestream omega. Papers by Menter, Kok and myself shows quite a large impact of the value for omega, if you use a standard Wilcox formulation of k-omega. If you use Menters, k-omega SST, or someother cross-diffusion modified omega-eq. you would probably have less dependency of the freestream omega. I would say that hybrid is good enough, but why not try shifting to van Leer or something else. Furthermore I would run a k-epsilon model as well, to check the measured data - you might not get good result, whichever model you use. A very rough wall would shift the log-law, and hence including friction could also help. Sorry that I couldn't help you more than this, however feel free to contact me,

Regards Jonas
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 60 July 17, 2024 06:45
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55
Please help with flow around car modelling! Tudor Miron CFX 17 March 19, 2004 20:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56.