|
[Sponsors] |
October 11, 2003, 20:32 |
Diffusion in tet meshes
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all
I know the issue of tet vs hex meshes has come-up before, particularly for boundary layer effects, but does anyone have any experience of solving a pure diffusion equation on a tetrahedral mesh (for example, heat conduction) ? I've been told that the inherent non-orthogonality of the mesh causes un-physical values (e.g. of temperature), even for numerical schemes that are supposed to be bounded. Comments appreciated. Johnson |
|
October 13, 2003, 03:59 |
Re: Diffusion in tet meshes
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You are correct,
The unboundedness is caused in the calculations of gradients over control volume faces. For non-orthogonal meshes the face area vector is decomposed into an orthogonal and non-orthogonal component. The non orthogonal contribution to the face gradient is treated explicitly by evaluating the gradients over the cells straddling the face and then interpolating the gradient to the face. Multiply this by the non-orthogonal component of the face area vector. The orthogonal contribution to the face gradient are treated implicitly. You might want to try to omit the non-orthogonal contribution to the face gradient all together, although this will introduce additional error into the calculation. Ragards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Technical] Why are hex meshes better than tet? | bigphil | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | July 18, 2016 13:20 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
leastSquares gradient on tet meshes | deepsterblue | OpenFOAM Bugs | 1 | June 4, 2010 18:23 |
[ICEM] how can i create a consistent transitions between tet and hex? specifically my model? | snailstb | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | March 15, 2010 21:26 |
FV discretisation on tet meshes | peter grafenberger | Main CFD Forum | 7 | October 29, 1999 07:32 |