|
[Sponsors] |
July 23, 2009, 09:19 |
divergence with higher order scheme
|
#1 |
New Member
Chandra
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I am doing DNS and am in process of implementing higher order schemes. I am done with implementing it in momentum equation etc. However, when it comes to calculate divergence in a cell, i.e. Div = du/dx+dv/dy+dw/dz, I am getting a bit confused whether I should implement higher order scheme here as well or I should keep it just second order accurate. I am asking it because if 2nd order accurate, du/dx = (u[i+1]-u[i])/(x[i+1]-x[i]) etc. on staggered grids. It gives a feeling of the rate of mass accumulation in the cell, a physically meaningful quantity. However, if we change this to 4th order discretization, du/dx = f(u[i+2], u[i+1], u[i], u[i-1]) etc. which doesn't look like giving mass accumulation in the cell in discrete manner. Could anyone please point out which one should be preferred? Thanks! |
|
July 23, 2009, 14:53 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 17 |
Usually you should keep the same order of discretization on all spatial derivatives if you want to have a pure 4 order scheme let's say. Otherwise your DNS will be only 2nd order.
|
|
Tags |
divergence, higher order |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Higher order terms in the equations | Argyle | Main CFD Forum | 7 | October 31, 2008 08:41 |
CFL condition for higher order schemes | Shyam | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 14, 2008 15:24 |
Higher order downwind scheme | jelmer | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | August 9, 2006 07:43 |
Higher order discretization on staggered grid | Chandra Shekhar | Main CFD Forum | 9 | January 27, 2005 17:31 |
Discretisation scheme in CFX-1st or 2nd order? | Pete | CFX | 10 | January 12, 2005 13:48 |